![]() Those stories dealt with secrets and puzzles from many years ago (hundreds or thousands in some cases) and they had that Indiana Jones for the art history major feel to them. For those who haven't read the book, you should know that this is not like the other 2 Dan Brown movies. I have read the book (and liked it) and I went to see it with 2 people who had not read it. Aside from Hanks, the story was muddled but chase-movie action and constant changes of beautiful scenery makes this entertaining if forgettable. Hank's role here is a slight departure from how he previously played the role, due to the circumstances that are made apparent from the very beginning (but I won't spoil), and yet he was excellent again as Robert Langdon. ![]() Edition watched: 2D IMAX The largest positive for this movie is Tom Hanks. If you haven't read the book, prepare to be confused, but it can still be an entertaining ride. ![]() Reading the book beforehand is a positive here and you will want to go see it, but keep expectations down and expect a radically altered story with no lasting impression. TL DR: This movie was good but forgettable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |